Thursday, October 11, 2012

Reaction Paper- October 4, 2012


Brandon Abrams
October 4, 2012
Reaction Paper, English IV

                Upon reading Earth Without People I immediately thought of the History channel’s widely un-popular show Life After People. While the History channel’s show didn’t receive the best ratings it did show realistic scenes of the planet after people. The article follows the same scenario and puts in words what Life After People put on film. These recounts of post-human life invoke all five senses to the audience and produce a powerful impact. The imagery used within the article further provides a strong sense of what this scenario would be like and grip the reader into this hypothetical, future world. I found after reading the article that imagery was most prevalent in descriptions of the Demilitarized Zone, urban areas, and the oceans.
                When I think of places without human intervention I typically think of National Parks like Yosemite and the Everglades, not the Demilitarized Zone between North and South Korea. The article details “dazzling white squadrons” of cranes floating through the air and nesting in the zone. The imagery used in this section shows an untouched part of the world away from human intervention. “(W)hite” conveys a pure image to the reader in a place that is un-soiled from humans. The passage shows how the world would be a better place without the harm of the human race and almost conveys guilt to the reader for allowing this to happen.
                  In Life After People one of the main things they focus on is the destruction of the world’s cities, Earth Without People does the same. The encroaching forest envelops urban areas as “The new wilderness would consume cities.” This almost consumes the reader and has the effect of an encroaching force coming to purify the scorned earth left by the human population. It invokes touch with this sea of trees coming down upon the Earth. This also shows a great sight of this wall of foliage descending upon the world.
                Finally, the article details the world’s oceans and how they would improve following the departure of man. This section of the article conveys additional guilt on the reader in that “humans have flattened the coral reefs on the continental shelves and scraped the sea grass beds bare.” To say that upon reading this I felt guilt would be an understatement and the same would be true for any reader. You hear the sound of the scraping as sea grass is ripped away from the sea floor. Overall, the section clings onto the reader and begs them to save the ocean’s ecosystems. 
                All in all, the article provides critical imagery to the reader in its detail of the Demilitarized Zone, urban areas, and the oceans. The article responds to these areas and how they are impacted by humans now and how they will change for the better upon man’s departure. I thoroughly enjoyed the article as it provided validation to often overused chants of “save the planet!” Though I don’t intend on registering with the Green Party I will take note next time when someone mentions environmental destruction by man and ponder if a world without the human race would be better off.

No comments:

Post a Comment